Agent MCP Directory

Miro: the 360 agent-readiness check

Miro scores 74 of 100 on Ora's agent-readiness scan, a B, read 9 November 2026. Of the five surfaces an agent acts on, Ora found 3: a public API, OAuth, a command line. A live server behind a shield, and a 445-character home page in front of it.

On 9 November 2026 the public site at miro.com scored 74 of 100 on Ora's agent-readiness scan, a B, in Ora's Productivity category. Ora probes a site the way an agent would: it requests pages with the agents' own user agents, reads robots.txt, looks for the files agents read, and tries the API, MCP and payment surfaces. This check reads the act layer first, because that is what the directory records, then the door, what an agent can read, and whether the company is found and recommended. Ora's one-line summary: Miro offers strong developer resource discoverability and SDK packages, but lacks WebMCP support for agent integration.

The score

Miro on Ora, read 2026-11-09: points per layer, with the share of each layer's maximum. 39 checks pass, 15 are partial, 25 fail and 53 do not apply to this site.
LayerAsksPointsShare
UsabilityCan agents use it59 of 8173%
AccessCan agents read it33 of 4672%
DiscoveryCan agents find and recommend it13 of 1681%
PaymentsCan agents pay0 of 0none apply
TotalGrade B74 of 10074%

What an agent can do

The surfaces an agent acts on: an API it can find and call, an MCP server, an agent card, OAuth metadata, a command line. This is the layer the directory records, so it comes first. 3 checks in this group do not apply to this site and are left out.

In the directory, Miro sign-in required, tools not seen, not counted; the connector run of 4 November 2026 is on the entry page. Ora's MCP server check for the same domain reads partial; the two look for different things, the directory for a server that answers a handshake and lists tools, Ora for a server it can find from the site.

What an agent can do: 16 checks Ora ran on miro.com, read 2026-11-09. The last column is Ora's own observation where it published one.
CheckResultPointsWhat Ora saw
MCP server / manifest mcp-serverPartial5 of 6MCP server detected at https://mcp.miro.com; it requires authentication. Presence is verified (5/6), but Ora could not inspect its tools or verify access scopes without credentials.
MCP well-known discovery mcp-well-known-discoveryPartial1 of 2MCP server at https://mcp.miro.com - list its server card, hosted on your own domain, in /.well-known/ai-catalog.json so MCP clients can discover it
Public API with reachable endpoints public-apiPass7 of 7REST API documentation found at /api. GraphQL endpoint at https://api.miro.com/v1/graphql is reachable; introspection requires authentication (API key / OAuth), which is expected for agent access.
Public API/docs linked from homepage public-api-docsPass3 of 3Documentation site found at https://developers.miro.com
Developer portal developer-portalPass6 of 6Developer documentation portal found at https://developers.miro.com
API catalog (RFC 9727) api-catalog-rfc9727Fail0 of 2No /.well-known/api-catalog found (RFC 9727)
OAuth 2.0 support oauth-supportPass5 of 5OAuth authorization server metadata at https://mcp.miro.com/
OAuth Protected Resource metadata (RFC 9728) oauth-protected-resourcePass2 of 2no detail published
auth.md exists auth-md-existsFail0 of 2No /auth.md found at site root
WebMCP support webmcpFail0 of 5No WebMCP support detected - no document.modelContext / navigator.modelContext usage found
NLWeb /ask endpoint nlweb-askFail0 of 1No NLWeb-conformant /ask endpoint found via GET or POST
CLI tool available cli-toolPass3 of 3CLI package found on npm: create-miro-app
Multi-language SDK packages rest-sdk-packagesPartial1 of 3SDK package found only in npm
Rate limit response headers rate-limit-headersPartial1 of 2The live API at https://miro.com/api returns legacy x-ratelimit-limit, x-ratelimit-remaining, x-ratelimit-reset headers. Adopting the IETF RateLimit-* standard would earn full credit.
Idempotency-Key support idempotency-key-supportFail0 of 3GraphQL introspection auth-gated and no idempotency documentation found on GraphQL-tagged pages
JSON error responses json-error-responsesPass4 of 4no detail published

At the door

What the site answers when a request arrives with an agent's user agent, and what robots.txt says to agents. One check in this group does not apply to this site and is left out.

At the door: 7 checks Ora ran on miro.com, read 2026-11-09. The last column is Ora's own observation where it published one.
CheckResultPointsWhat Ora saw
Not blocked by bot detection bot-detectionPass2 of 2Site accessible to 4 agent user-agents (ChatGPT-User, OAI-SearchBot, Claude-User, PerplexityBot).
Agent crawler reachability agent-crawler-reachabilityPass2 of 2Reachable to every agent we tested - ChatGPT-User: reachable, OAI-SearchBot: reachable, Claude-User: reachable, PerplexityBot: reachable
robots.txt AI crawler policy robots-ai-policy-qualityPass2 of 2AI search crawlers: allowed in 3 of 3 checks (3 crawlers on 1 page). AI training crawlers: allowed in 2 of 2 checks (2 crawlers on 1 page), not scored.
robots.txt agent-user policy robots-agent-user-policyPass2 of 2No applicable crawl or usage restriction found for 3 user-triggered agents (chatgpt-user, claude-user, perplexity-user) on 1 public page: https://miro.com/. Declared policy only;
Content behind auth docs-auth-gatePass2 of 2All 5 sampled pages are publicly readable (0 with substantive content)
Homepage not hidden from search noindex-directivesPass1 of 1No noindex on the homepage: no robots, googlebot or bingbot meta tag and no X-Robots-Tag header hides it from search.
Redirect hygiene redirect-hygienePass1 of 1no detail published

What an agent can read

Whether the text is in the first response, what the site publishes for agents, and how it describes itself to them. 2 checks in this group do not apply to this site and are left out.

What an agent can read: 15 checks Ora ran on miro.com, read 2026-11-09. The last column is Ora's own observation where it published one.
CheckResultPointsWhat Ora saw
Content without JavaScript content-no-jsPartial1 of 3Homepage: Only 445 chars of text content - agents see limited content. No inner pages checked: the 5 sampled pages were skipped (forms, login pages, bot challenges, error pages,
Page token budget page-token-budgetPass1 of 1All 1 measured page fit an agent context budget (largest ~1K tokens)
Sitemap exists sitemapPass2 of 2Valid sitemap found at https://miro.com/sitemap.xml with multiple sitemaps entries
Sitemap freshness (lastmod) sitemap-lastmodPass1 of 1no detail published
llms.txt exists llms-txt-existsPass1 of 1Found the llms.txt at https://developers.miro.com/llms.txt.
llms.txt formatting llms-txt-formattingPartial1 of 2The llms.txt is well-formatted with markdown links, but at 95,346 characters it exceeds the 30,000-character recommendation for a navigation index.
Markdown agent docs markdown-negotiationPass1 of 1Returns markdown when requested via Accept header
Markdown URL fallback markdown-url-fallbackFail0 of 2Homepage does not support the .md suffix. Probed https://miro.com/index.md and it did not return markdown (expected text/markdown content-type or a heading-led non-HTML body).
Bot-UA markdown serving agent-ua-markdownFail0 of 1No probed bot User-Agent (ChatGPT-User, Claude-User, Perplexity-User) receives markdown when requesting HTML. Optional: detect AI-bot UAs server-side and serve them a markdown representation directly.
Agent mode view agent-mode-viewPass2 of 2no detail published
JSON-LD structured data json-ldFail0 of 4No JSON-LD structured data found on homepage
Organization schema completeness org-schema-completenessFail0 of 2No JSON-LD found - Organization schema missing
JSON-LD entity linking (sameAs) json-ld-entity-linkingFail0 of 2No JSON-LD found - no entity linking possible
Schema type breadth schema-type-breadthFail0 of 2No extended schema types found - AI can only answer basic questions about this entity
Metadata completeness metadata-completenessPass2 of 2All metadata signals present: canonical URL, lang="en", og:image, og:type

Found and recommended

Whether an assistant can find the company by name, confirm what it is, and see it in the registries agents read. One check in this group does not apply to this site and is left out.

Found and recommended: 8 checks Ora ran on miro.com, read 2026-11-09. The last column is Ora's own observation where it published one.
CheckResultPointsWhat Ora saw
Brand name discoverability brand-search-accuracyPartial1 of 3miro.com ranks #8 for "AI Innovation Workspace visual collaboration"
Wikipedia / Wikidata entity presence wikipedia-presencePartial2 of 4Wikidata Q94126521 (Miro) verified - draft a Wikipedia page with cited references to complete knowledge graph coverage
Developer resource discoverability agentic-search-specificPass3 of 3no detail published
Listed in MCP registries mcp-registry-listedPass1 of 1no detail published
NPM/PyPI SDK package npm-sdk-packagePass1 of 1no detail published
ChatGPT app listed chatgpt-app-listedPass2 of 2no detail published
Listed on skills.sh skills-sh-listedPass1 of 1no detail published
ARD discovery ard-catalogFail0 of 1No /.well-known/ard.json, no same-site rel="ard" link, and no legacy /.well-known/ai-catalog.json

Payments

The agent payment protocols Ora probes for. A site that sells nothing has nothing here, and Ora scores the layer out of zero when none applies. None of the 6 payment checks applied to miro.com.

The fixes worth most points

Ora attaches an estimate to each failing or partial check: how many points the site would gain by passing it. These are the 5 with the largest estimates for Miro, with what Ora observed. The wording of each fix is Ora's; the 28 checks it runs on an MCP server are listed with their layer and tier.

  • JSON-LD structured data: fail, 0 of 4, about 2.9 points to gain. Ora saw: No JSON-LD structured data found on homepage
  • Brand name discoverability: partial, 1 of 3, about 2.8 points to gain. Ora saw: miro.com ranks #8 for "AI Innovation Workspace visual collaboration"
  • WebMCP support: fail, 0 of 5, about 2.7 points to gain. Ora saw: No WebMCP support detected - no document.modelContext / navigator.modelContext usage found
  • GraphQL typed error model: fail, 0 of 3, about 1.6 points to gain. Ora saw: GraphQL introspection auth-gated and no typed graphql error model documentation found on GraphQL-tagged pages
  • Idempotency-Key support: fail, 0 of 3, about 1.6 points to gain. Ora saw: GraphQL introspection auth-gated and no idempotency documentation found on GraphQL-tagged pages

Our read

Miro's read is divided by a shield. The MCP server at mcp.miro.com answers and requires authentication, with OAuth authorization server metadata on the same host; the REST documentation at developers.miro.com carries an llms.txt, the GraphQL endpoint at api.miro.com is reachable, create-miro-app is on npm and the site returns markdown when an agent asks for it. Three probes were answered 403 by a bot shield, the OpenAPI specification, the A2A agent card and the agent skills index, so those rows are unverified and the Access layer's maximum shrinks to 46. What Ora could confirm against the site is on the reading side: a home page of 445 characters without JavaScript, no inner page that could be sampled, no JSON-LD, and a brand search that places the domain eighth for a term Ora read off the page. A board every agent will be asked to draw on; the page an agent lands on is almost empty.

Test your own surfaces

The scan above is free and needs no account: enter a domain at ora.ai and read the same four layers for your own site. For an MCP server, Ora scans the server URL itself and runs 28 of its 132 public checks on it, which is why it is the check this directory recommends; the reasons, the limits and the alternatives are on their own page. The command below runs the same audit from a terminal and exits with 1 under the score you set, so it can gate a deploy.

npx ax@0.10 audit https://example.com --min-score 70

All 360 checks, one company a day. Corrections to the corrections page.